@article{LCNL:48,
	author={Mark S. Seidenberg and Aimee Arnoldussen},
	year={2003},
	month={06},
	title={The brain makes a distinction between hard and easy stimuli: Comments on Baretta et al.},
	journal={Brain and Language},
	volume={85},
	number={3},
	pages={527-530},
	comments={Can neuroimaging provide decisive evidence concerning competing theories of past tense morphology? And what about German, anyway?},
	abstract={The Beretta et al. study tested an invalid prediction concerning connectionist models of inflectional morphology and the study exhibits a confound between type of stimulus (regular, irregular) and processing difficulty (easy, hard) that invalidates their conclusions. Harder stimuli produced greater activation across a broader range of brain areas, as in previous studies, but the data have no bearing on the rules vs. connections debate.},
	language={English},
	keywords={event-related potentials; morphological inflection; German language; regular vs irregular nouns & verb inflections; Brain; Evoked Potentials; Inflection; Morphology (Language); Nouns; Verbs},
	issn={0093934X},
	URL={http://lcnl.wisc.edu/publications/archive/48.pdf},
}